“Harmonics” refer to the notes that sound when instead of stopping the string firmly with a finger, we just touch it lightly. Harmonics can be divided into “Natural Harmonics” (only one finger touches the string) and “Artificial Harmonics” (a lower finger – usually the thumb – actually stops the string firmly, while a higher finger just touches the string gently). Before we talk about the differences between these two types of harmonic, let’s talk about the similarities.

Harmonics take us into a different physical and sound world from normal stopped notes and can teach us a lot, especially about “not forcing”. For both the left hand and the right hand, harmonics teach us to use delicacy and lightness, rather than pressure. When using harmonics we are transformed from opera singer into child soprano, from bass (or tenor) to falsetto (countertenor). When playing harmonics, volume, vibrato, density and intensity are replaced by purity, lightness and innocence. Compare the following four versions of Mary Had A Little Lamb: one is played normally while the other three are played with harmonics of different types (natural and artificial).

marys lamb x 4


For harmonics we can use a point of contact somewhat closer to the bridge than for normal (stopped) notes. In fact, no matter how close to the bridge our bow is, it is quite difficult to get the sound of a harmonic to “break”. “Sul ponticello” doesn’t exist for harmonics. Harmonics also encourage us to use faster bow speeds and less bow pressure than we would for “normal” notes.


Harmonics give our left hand the unique, wonderful and almost magically effortless experience of playing without finger pressure. The simultaneous combination of total relaxation of finger pressure with the need for tension in other parts of the hand can however create some curious situations:

  • the complete absence of finger pressure in natural harmonics can lead us to unconsciously relax the hand so much that we no longer separate the fingers sufficiently to reach the required distances, especially in the case of extensions. Try the Mary’s Harmonic Lamb example above (with natural harmonics) to see if this is also true for you. This problem possibly only significantly affects smaller hands
  • in the case of artificial harmonics, in order to produce a clean clear harmonic we need to combine the absolute lightness of touch of the higher (harmonic) finger with a very firm pressure of the stopping finger (usually the thumb). This is quite a feat of fine motor skill and coordination.


One of the complications associated with harmonics is that there are usually several different possible ways (fingerings) to obtain the same harmonic pitch. There are not only just several different natural harmonics which give the same pitch but we also have the possibility of using different artificial harmonics to play any possible harmonic pitch. Because of this large choice, composers often don’t know how to notate harmonics in the most practical cellistic way. Sometimes composers will just write the pitches they want, with the harmonic sign over each note, for example:

mary harmonic simple notation

This type of  harmonic notation requires that the cellist work out the most appropriate fingering, and we will often need to rewrite the notes according to how they will be played. We saw above how this “Mary Had a Little Lamb” tune could be played entirely with natural harmonics. But it could also be played using artificial harmonics. In both cases it needs to be almost completely rewritten in a way that, instead of writing how it sounds, we write what we actually need to do in order to make those sounds, for example: (and see also the version with natural harmonics above)

mary arti harms

At other times, composers may try and work out the best fingering. If they get it right then we are lucky …. we don’t need to rewrite anything. But quite often they get it wrong! In these cases, once again, we may need to rewrite the passage or some of the notes in it. The following example, from Stravinsky’s “The Rite of Spring”, illustrates these two situations. First is what Stravinsky wrote ….and then the cellist’s playable (renotated) version.

rite of spring

Often, as in the above examples, we will end up using a mix of natural and artificial harmonics where the composer has just specified “harmonics”.


Normally we would expect natural harmonics to be perfectly in tune, according to all the beautiful mathematical Pythagorean laws. How could dividing the string in perfectly equal proportions (in half, in three, in four, in five etc) not produce perfectly in tune notes? Well, nature and physics play some tricks on us and as we divide the string into smaller fractions the harmonics become increasingly out of tune. Certainly the harmonic that we get when we divide the string into five equal parts, is consistently flat, no matter on which node of the harmonic we place our finger. For this reason, no matter how it is notated, we will probably be better off playing it with the artificial harmonic. In this way we can correct its intonation. This is especially important in longer held notes. It¡’s a shame that nobody told Ravel this vital bit of information!

harm in 5 or arti

For a detailed discussion of both Natural and Artificial Harmonics, click on the following links:

Natural Harmonics              Artificial Harmonics